<div><div dir="auto">I just read the code, didn’t try to fileIn yet, but that’s weird if it didn’t delete it...</div></div><div> <div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 9:41 PM, Andres Valloud via Cuis-dev <<a href="mailto:cuis-dev@lists.cuis.st">cuis-dev@lists.cuis.st</a>> wrote: </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204)">Now I understand even less. After doing that, there is still a SequenceableCollectionInspector, and so the fileout I sent is valid. I verified it loads as intended. Luciano, I can see the class deletion in 4164. Nevertheless, after doing what Juan says, the fileout I sent loads fine. Did you run into a problem loading the code? Or, was your comment more from a static perspective (i.e. just looking at code and seeing something that didn't make a lot of sense)? On 5/24/20 07:33, Andres Valloud via Cuis-dev wrote: > Yeah --- next time, only one of us pushes out to the list at the same > time :). > > On 5/24/20 07:14, Juan Vuletich wrote: >> Maybe to resync it would be best to start again with a git pull, load >> all updates, and then the changesets in this mail thread. >> >> On 5/24/2020 10:48 AM, Andres Valloud via Cuis-dev wrote: >>> /me scratches head, what's going on here?... Juan and I have been >>> exchanging code, maybe I got out of sync with him. We did agree that >>> there was a method with unnecessary exception handling that should be >>> removed, I meant to remove that bit. >>> >>> On 5/24/20 06:39, Luciano Notarfrancesco via Cuis-dev wrote: >>>> I don’t understand, didn’t you remove that class in 4164 above? >>>> >>>> On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 8:35 PM, Andres Valloud via Cuis-dev >>>> <<a href="mailto:cuis-dev@lists.cuis.st" target="_blank">cuis-dev@lists.cuis.st</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:cuis-dev@lists.cuis.st" target="_blank">cuis-dev@lists.cuis.st</a>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Another small change. >>>> >>>> On 5/24/20 05:32, Juan Vuletich via Cuis-dev wrote: >>>> > On 5/22/2020 8:08 PM, Juan Vuletich via Cuis-dev wrote: >>>> >> Hi Folks, >>>> >> >>>> >> Andrés Valloud and I found a couple of bugs and inconsistencies >>>> in the >>>> >> Inspector hierarchy. If you don't mind crashing your image you >>>> might >>>> >> try `(1 to: 2000) asFloat64Array`, or inspecting an >>>> OrderedCollection >>>> >> with an object that fails in #printOn:, and cycle the collection >>>> with >>>> >> the arrow keys. >>>> >> >>>> >> We did quite some refactor and cleanup. The result is attached. >>>> Please >>>> >> take a look. >>>> >> >>>> >> Thanks, >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > After those, these follow. Any comment is appreciated. >>>> > >>>> > Cheers, >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- Cuis-dev mailing list >>>> <a href="mailto:Cuis-dev@lists.cuis.st" target="_blank">Cuis-dev@lists.cuis.st</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Cuis-dev@lists.cuis.st" target="_blank">Cuis-dev@lists.cuis.st</a>> >>>> <a href="https://lists.cuis.st/mailman/listinfo/cuis-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.cuis.st/mailman/listinfo/cuis-dev</a> >>>> >>>> >> >> -- Cuis-dev mailing list <a href="mailto:Cuis-dev@lists.cuis.st" target="_blank">Cuis-dev@lists.cuis.st</a> <a href="https://lists.cuis.st/mailman/listinfo/cuis-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.cuis.st/mailman/listinfo/cuis-dev</a> </blockquote></div></div>