<div dir="ltr">I think find this article pretty related: <a href="https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/programs-must-not-limit-freedom-to-run.html">https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/programs-must-not-limit-freedom-to-run.html</a><br><br>It finishes saying: <i>The conclusion is clear: a program must not restrict what jobs its
users do with it. Freedom 0 must be complete. We need to stop
torture, but we can't do it through software licenses. The proper job
of software licenses is to establish and protect users' freedom.</i></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">El sáb., 13 jun. 2020 a las 16:41, Phil B via Cuis-dev (<<a href="mailto:cuis-dev@lists.cuis.st">cuis-dev@lists.cuis.st</a>>) escribió:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">The Smalltalk community is among the *least* political of any tech community I've seen. Even things like copyright which are the subject of endless debate in other communities is only barely acknowledged (to the extent that it's generally disliked that they have to deal with it.) Codes of Conduct? Nope, people just generally try to be nice to each other. I think a lot of that comes from Alan and Dan's leadership in the early days of both Smalltalk and Squeak and the type of people that gravitated toward them... they had a mission, but it wasn't political at all. If I had to describe the average Smalltalker, 'idealist' comes to mind.</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 2:47 PM Philip Bernhart via Cuis-dev <<a href="mailto:cuis-dev@lists.cuis.st" target="_blank">cuis-dev@lists.cuis.st</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi folks,<br>
<br>
today I had a quiet annoying "debate" with someone I know<br>
on the internet. XKCD for reference for the feeling of it:<br>
<a href="https://xkcd.com/386" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://xkcd.com/386</a>.<br>
<br>
So I always wondered what the political statements and movements<br>
were in Smalltalk or even Cuis Smalltalk. Squeak, Pharo and Cuis<br>
did chose the very political MIT License as their License of choice.<br>
<br>
Smalltalk was financed partially from the ARPA, so actually quiet<br>
political, right? When you consider that you can't escape making<br>
in some way political relevant decisions, then does that mean<br>
automatically that the Smalltalk community "thinks" it's good that<br>
their "open source" code is used within weapon systems. Maybe even<br>
in the context of Kapital to mess up finance systems or indirectly<br>
by using within Lam Research for producing circuits which could be<br>
used in war drones, etc.<br>
<br>
Most of us I would think are spending their time toying around with<br>
Smalltalk, not considering every aspect of how we indirectly affect<br>
other people around the globe with our "naive" mind of just liking<br>
what we are doing.<br>
<br>
<br>
So what do you think, should we spend more time on that side?<br>
Philip<br>
<br>
<br>
PS: I got some popcorn here and I'm resting in a comfy chair.<br>
PPS: The current Yerba Mate infusion also adds to it.<br>
-- <br>
Cuis-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Cuis-dev@lists.cuis.st" target="_blank">Cuis-dev@lists.cuis.st</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.cuis.st/mailman/listinfo/cuis-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.cuis.st/mailman/listinfo/cuis-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
-- <br>
Cuis-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Cuis-dev@lists.cuis.st" target="_blank">Cuis-dev@lists.cuis.st</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.cuis.st/mailman/listinfo/cuis-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.cuis.st/mailman/listinfo/cuis-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>