<html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 17/06/2020 à 12:44, Douglas Brebner via Cuis-dev a écrit : </div> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:e4ad954a-394d-d010-8fe9-606e6e640cc1@gmail.com"> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 17/06/2020 11:17, Hilaire Fernandes via Cuis-dev wrote: </div> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:8556e64a-3c53-7ad6-8660-0f342d99c9cc@drgeo.eu"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> - namespace for safe installation of applications/bundles, - sandbox environment for safe execution of applications/bundles, </blockquote> I've recently been thinking of some kind of Actors in the form on sub-images or mini images ran in parallel that may be a way to handle those cleanly. Inspired somewhat by Alan Kays comment about how the computer should be split into smaller computers. Objects don't quite have the properties to be that (due to Process) but the Image *does*. </blockquote> Oh yes this is wise. Even stronger, we do not have the choice given the single thread nature of the VM, it will be a waste of resources to not have several image running in parallel. I vaguely know that there are inter process protocol for communication between process (IPC). Should it be fast enough for communication between applications deployed in different images? Likely a Dynabook will be based on ARM architecture. The A64 SoC shipped with Pine64[1] comes with 6 cores! Using only one will be a waste of resources. Hilaire [1] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.pine64.org/">https://www.pine64.org/</a> <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- GNU Dr. Geo <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://drgeo.eu">http://drgeo.eu</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://pouet.chapril.org/@hilaire">https://pouet.chapril.org/@hilaire</a></pre> </body> </html>