<html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hi guys, </div> <div class="moz-cite-prefix"> </div> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 24/12/2021 à 07:12, Luciano Notarfrancesco a écrit : </div> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:CAL5GDyqW2X1iwVQH-Pa_Sz6Lr8PV1Z2oQ5ub-K6rYHhR2zd3ag@mail.gmail.com">I’ve been thinking about it and I would rename KernelMorph to RectangularMorph, as in the original Morphic, because I think having rectangular bounds is enough to call it “rectangular”. It’s not a rectangle, tho (it wouldn’t make sense to call it RectangleMorph). And about WidgetMorph I’d keep that name and make it subclass of RectangularMorph (it just adds borderWidth and borderColor).</blockquote> Yes and No. Yes. The RectangularMorph or maybe just RectMorph will be more meaningful than Kernel/SpecialMorph. Some user will read Rectangle and be confused, because subclass of KernelMorph can be non rectangle (Think about a disc or an ellipse) In that case I will call it a BoxyMorph or BoxMorph because a rectangular, ellipse, or any other shape defined by its -x and -y extents are kind of box. No. Because the intend of Juan is to make Widget not limited to Rectangular like widget, but to extend it to widget with any kind of shape. So it can't be a sublcass of KernelMorph. In Juan, renaming scheme, this is GUIControlMorph which could be a subclass of KernelMorph. My poor Juan, I think we add a lot of confusion we our opinions ;-) Reading at your email, we want coherent names for these fundamental classes. Here is a distilled proposal from your suggestions: MovableMorph -> MorphicWidget -> WidgetMorph (subclass of Morph) WidgetMorph -> GUIControlMorph -> RectWidgetMorph (subclass of WidgetMorph as for now) KernelMorph -> SpecialMorph -> BoxyMorph / BoxMorph (subclass of WidgetMorph) WorldMorph + PasteUpMorph -> WorldMorph I think having both WidgetMorph and RectWidgetMorph names (or anything with the same idea) will help the future users to distinguish these two kinds of widget and not be confused as I was. As Luciano mentioned it, we can wonder why in the current name scheme WidgetMoprh is not a subclass of KernelMorph. But maybe we can keep this for later and Juan may have some good reason. Best wishes to all of you! Hilaire <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- GNU Dr. Geo <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://drgeo.eu">http://drgeo.eu</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://blog.drgeo.eu">http://blog.drgeo.eu</a></pre> </body> </html>