<html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> Hi Mariano, Ok I got it. Writing the documentation in Erudite source format is fine as long as it is not melted with Smalltalk classes and methods, can be versioned independently, translated, etc. I don't think then it will be more difficult to edit than Texinfo. So it only needs to build Erudite book from erudite source format files. <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 15/10/2022 à 15:18, Mariano Montone via Cuis-dev a écrit : </div> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:8c30ffe3-6b59-8d4a-5903-62d8f412d25d@gmail.com">My example was with Markdown, but you would use files in Erudite source format, not Markdown, for your usecase. Then you build Erudite books from those files. It is straightforward. There are no conversions. Only matter: there are no good external editing tools for those files, that can give you a preview, etc. But, are there good user-facing editing tools for TexInfo, for example? Not sure Emacs counts. So, I think it would be more or less like what you have now with TexInfo, but you would have Erudite source files instead. Also, I'm thinking a specialized Erudite editor could be provided for files in Erudite format, coded in Cuis + Erudite, if you wanted. </blockquote> <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- GNU Dr. Geo <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://drgeo.eu">http://drgeo.eu</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://blog.drgeo.eu">http://blog.drgeo.eu</a></pre> </body> </html>