<html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> Hi, Mariano, it is nice to have alternatives. Nevertheless, my first though was that Cuis-Smalltalk-Extra was a too generic name and the repo may just end as a load of unrelated packages. Then as Juan, I though -tools will be a better name. Whatever, choices is yours. More important, I encourage people writing widgets for their own project to contribute back to Cuis-Smalltalk-UI and to make the effort to adapt to the existing stuff there. I did this extensively when porting DrGeo and facing the need to write more widgets. I think it is important for the community. The worst scenario will be to have various widgets in different repo the newbies will not find or have difficulties to reuse. I don't think our community is big enough to dilute Mariano, it seems you have writing some widgets for your preference browser, it will be nice to reviewer if some could be extracted to Cuis-Smalltalk-UI and see how to integrate. It will make it easier for other to reuse, including me. Thanks Hilaire <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 16/06/2023 à 21:03, Juan Vuletich via Cuis-dev a écrit : </div> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:648CB1EA.4030409@cuis.st"> I agree with Luciano. The point of having packages is to give all us extra freedom. It is good to converge on a single implementation, but sometimes it's better to pursue several in parallel. Still, when possible, I prefer avoiding duplicate names, to reduce confusion for instance in emails, or ambiguity when doing `Feature require: 'PreferencesBrowser'`. Calling it CompactPreferenceBrowser is ok. Mariano, I agree that the best option is a new repo in the Cuis-Smalltalk organization. What about 'Cuis-Smalltalk-Tools' ? I believe that stuff in Cuis-Smalltalk-Dev/Packages/Tools and Cuis-Smalltalk-Dev/Packages/DevTools also belong there. If people agree, I'm willing to create it, and grant write access to anyone asking. Other possible reorganization could be to move OpenCL to its own repo.</blockquote> <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- GNU Dr. Geo <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://drgeo.eu">http://drgeo.eu</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://blog.drgeo.eu">http://blog.drgeo.eu</a></pre> </body> </html>