<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><font size="4">At freeze time of Cuis-Stable, I would do the
testing and tagging on the packages I am maintaining or forking.
<br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="4">We could document the process in Cuis-Smalltalk,
for both maintainers and users of the packages. I confess I have
little knowledge of git tagging/branching it will be an
opportunity to learn.<br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="4">Once, we have settle down the scheme of third
party packages over Cuis-stable, I agree DrGeo release could
follow Cuis release schedule as Ken and you exposed it. After
each Cuis-Stable, I can, if it make sense in the development
process of DrGeo, release of new version using Cuis-Stable, then
continue the development with Cuis-current.</font></p>
<p><font size="4">For the forthcoming release of DrGeo in a few
weeks, I will likely use Cuis-current because I already updated
DrGeo code with the API changes.<br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="4">Thanks<br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="4">Hilaire<br>
</font></p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
GNU Dr. Geo
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://gnu.org/s/dr-geo/">http://gnu.org/s/dr-geo/</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://gnu-drgeo.blogspot.com/">http://gnu-drgeo.blogspot.com/</a></pre>
</body>
</html>