<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><font size="4">My personal experience will be: use name prefix
for Application package (DrGeo) and don't for library package
(Cuis-Smalltalk-UI, Gettext, Locale,etc)</font><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 23/06/2024 à 02:18, Mark Volkmann
via Cuis-dev a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAFfRWnW_gjoXihPSd7z2P0oqNQUYQupozyiPkps3cD2PO4KyTg@mail.gmail.com">As
a newcomer to Smalltalk, but with many years of experience in lots
of other languages, my main concern is that I will encounter name
conflicts when using packages written by others if I don't add a
prefix to my classes. But perhaps that isn't as likely as I'm
thinking. I wonder if the situation is different if I'm creating a
library of classes that I expect many others to use. Is there a
consensus that name prefixes are more important for such
libraries?</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
GNU Dr. Geo
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://gnu.org/s/dr-geo/">http://gnu.org/s/dr-geo/</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://gnu-drgeo.blogspot.com/">http://gnu-drgeo.blogspot.com/</a></pre>
</body>
</html>