<!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> Hi folks,. The video of our discussion today is referenced in the archive section of our community page <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://cuis.st/community">http://cuis.st/community</a> I have few comments, observation, questions and requests. The BoxMorph seems to have only one direct subclass (BorderedBoxMorph), but the idea is to open to possibility for subclasses to only have extent and no border, right? I open a discussion about that several days ago. Is it because of that? Why BoxedMorph not a subclass of BoxMorph? About the name BoxedMorph and BorderedBoxMorph have the same meaning in their names. What about renaming BorderedBoxMoprh to PaddedBoxMorph. If we merge back together BoxMorph and BoxedMorph we will avoid the code duplication we have between BoxedMorph and BordederdBoxMorph (related to my first observation) It will nice to rephrase the comments at the end of the BoxedMorph and BoxMorph. It still don't understand the sentences BorderedBoxMorph class comment writes about BorderedRectMorph... Thanks for this nice improvement on layout Hilaire <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- GNU Dr. Geo <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://gnu.org/s/dr-geo/">http://gnu.org/s/dr-geo/</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://gnu-drgeo.blogspot.com/">http://gnu-drgeo.blogspot.com/</a></pre> </body> </html>