<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hi Hilaire,<br>
<br>
On 9/11/2024 2:31 PM, Hilaire Fernandes via Cuis-dev wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:9e933a14-0dfe-4d0b-8378-fce59423d2d7@free.fr"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p><font size="4">Hi folks,.</font></p>
<p><font size="4">The video of our discussion today is referenced
in the archive section of our community page <a
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://cuis.st/community">http://cuis.st/community</a><br>
</font></p>
</blockquote>
<br>
Cool!<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:9e933a14-0dfe-4d0b-8378-fce59423d2d7@free.fr"
type="cite">
<p><font size="4"> </font></p>
<p><font size="4">I have few comments, observation, questions and
requests.</font></p>
<p><font size="4">The BoxMorph seems to have only one direct
subclass (BorderedBoxMorph), but the idea is to open to
possibility for subclasses to only have extent and no border,
right? I open a discussion about that several days ago. Is it
because of that?</font></p>
</blockquote>
<br>
Yes. In addition to that, I've just added ColoredBoxMorph between
BoxMorph and BorderedBoxMorph and moved ivar 'color' there. There
are several classes that have color, but no border or padding.<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:9e933a14-0dfe-4d0b-8378-fce59423d2d7@free.fr"
type="cite">
<p><font size="4">Why BoxedMorph not a subclass of BoxMorph?</font></p>
</blockquote>
<br>
Because it is easier to create the new hierarchy, then move all
subclasses of BoxedMorph there, and finally remove BoxedMorph. Will
take a few days to get there.<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:9e933a14-0dfe-4d0b-8378-fce59423d2d7@free.fr"
type="cite">
<p><font size="4">About the name BoxedMorph and BorderedBoxMorph
have the same meaning in their names. What about renaming
BorderedBoxMoprh to PaddedBoxMorph.</font></p>
<p><font size="4">If we merge back together BoxMorph and
BoxedMorph we will avoid the code duplication we have between
BoxedMorph and BordederdBoxMorph (related to my first
observation)<br>
</font></p>
</blockquote>
<br>
No, BoxedMorph will be removed.<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:9e933a14-0dfe-4d0b-8378-fce59423d2d7@free.fr"
type="cite">
<p><font size="4"> </font></p>
<p><font size="4">It will nice to rephrase the comments at the end
of the BoxedMorph and BoxMorph. It still don't understand the
sentences<br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="4">BorderedBoxMorph class comment writes about
BorderedRectMorph...<br>
</font></p>
</blockquote>
<br>
I'll take a look<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:9e933a14-0dfe-4d0b-8378-fce59423d2d7@free.fr"
type="cite">
<p><font size="4"> </font></p>
<p><font size="4">Thanks for this nice improvement on layout<br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="4">Hilaire</font></p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
GNU Dr. Geo
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://gnu.org/s/dr-geo/">http://gnu.org/s/dr-geo/</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://gnu-drgeo.blogspot.com/">http://gnu-drgeo.blogspot.com/</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Thanks!<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Juan Vuletich
cuis.st
github.com/jvuletich
researchgate.net/profile/Juan-Vuletich
independent.academia.edu/JuanVuletich
patents.justia.com/inventor/juan-manuel-vuletich
linkedin.com/in/juan-vuletich-75611b3
twitter.com/JuanVuletich</pre>
</body>
</html>