<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><font size="4">Hi Juan, <br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="4">Answers in-lined.<br>
</font></p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 19/05/2025 à 20:25, Juan Vuletich a
écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:682B77AE.3030607@cuis.st">"How-to
guides" also makes a lot of sense. However I would completely
remove the "Virtual Machine" section. Cuis-Smalltalk-Dev already
includes VMs for major platforms. 99% of Cuis users don't need to
build a VM. Helping the other 1% is fine, but I think that is "Pro
Level" documentation and it belongs somewhere else. Having that in
the same place as building packages or working with layouts may
make people think that hacking the VM is as important or frequent
as doing packages and layouts. Even worse. It may lead people to
believe that building their own package or using Layouts in their
code is as difficult and "experts only" as hacking the VM. We
provide well tested VMs for most platforms so people can forget
about this as much as possible.<br>
</blockquote>
<p>Noted, I agree under the "first impression count" perspective. It
may give an unjustified feeling of difficulty.</p>
<p> I just removed it.<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:682B77AE.3030607@cuis.st"> <br>
"Reference guides" is OK. I think that other reference material
could be added here. Perhaps the services offered by MorphicCanvas
would belong here. Or some comprehensive discussion about Unicode.
I'm sure there are many more that don't come to my mind right now.<br>
<br>
"Explanations" looks like a place to put stuff that didn't belong
in any of the previous categories. Currently it includes both
introductory material, highly technical stuff, and lose bits of
information. I think this could be improved. For instance,
separating "Philosophical" and "Technical" material as done in
Cuis-Smalltalk-Dev/Documentation, makes sense to me.<br>
</blockquote>
<p>The idea is to have deeper understanding, in both a technical
perspective (it may relate to the Technique repo) and more large
scale perspective (aka philosophical). The latter one may be the
one not fitting this category as described in the documentation
system, but we are free to diverge.<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:682B77AE.3030607@cuis.st"> <br>
Additionally, the question remains whether this should duplicate
the material in Cuis-Smalltalk-Dev/Documentation, or which parts
belong in DrCuis, and witch belong in Cuis-Smalltalk-Dev.</blockquote>
<p>Duplication may result in wasted resources.</p>
<p>Options: keeping VM, plugin, FFI to Cuis-Smalltalk-Dev, and other
more <i>classic user</i> at DrCuis<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mamot.fr/@drgeo">http://mamot.fr/@drgeo</a></pre>
</body>
</html>