<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
On 5/27/2025 5:19 PM, Hilaire Fernandes via Cuis-dev wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:0590e97e-f90b-4adb-b380-99a68979c446@free.fr"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p><font size="4">Then what about that. What a user may expect as
a result when reading at that code? Could it be treated as a
special case to indicate only icon?<br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="4">button := PluggableButtonMorph model: 42 action:
#startGame ::<br>
enableSelector: #notNil;<br>
icon: Theme current playIcon;<br>
borderWidth: 2;<br>
color: Color transparent;<br>
borderColor: Color black;<br>
setBalloonText: 'Play the game';<br>
morphExtent: 64 asPoint.</font></p>
<p><font size="4"><br>
</font></p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mamot.fr/@drgeo">http://mamot.fr/@drgeo</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Sure, but how we specify "icon + visible button" then? If we make it
'iconPlusButtonShape:' then we'd also change 'label:' into
'labelPlusButtonShape:' for consistency. It seemed to me that
buttons to have a button shape, and optional icon, label or both
should be the default. In any case, we need to find good wording for
all cases, right?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Juan Vuletich
cuis.st
github.com/jvuletich
researchgate.net/profile/Juan-Vuletich
independent.academia.edu/JuanVuletich
patents.justia.com/inventor/juan-manuel-vuletich
linkedin.com/in/juan-vuletich-75611b3
twitter.com/JuanVuletich</pre>
</body>
</html>