<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><font size="4">I do in DrGeo. Plenty of direct descendend of
Morph. I don't want to have thousand of morph with unnecessary
location attributes. </font></p>
<p><font size="4">Direct submorph make pretty sense when the morph
(view) is paired with a model object, used to compute the
location of the morph (view) in its owner Morph (for example a
canvas, or drawable in GTK terminology)</font></p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 08/11/2025 à 13:04, Luciano
Notarfrancesco via Cuis-dev a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAL5GDyo-CpteVVw2fAYome43-JNCK6fgw4tFkJS95pjxtOUOHA@mail.gmail.com">BTW,
a few years ago, for drawing graphs I made GraphEdgeMorph subclass
of Morph, and it works but no one seems to do that (the only
subclass of Morph in the base image is PlacedMorph), is there a
reason for this? Does anyone here have subclasses of Morph in
their projects?</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mamot.fr/@drgeo">http://mamot.fr/@drgeo</a></pre>
</body>
</html>