<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 4:46 PM Juan Vuletich <<a href="mailto:juan@cuis.st">juan@cuis.st</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><u></u>
<div>
<p>Hi Pocho,</p>
<div>On 2025-12-23 3:08 PM, Javier Pimás via
Cuis-dev wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Hi cuisers,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I did a change to Json package and when saving it to disk I
noticed that all preexisting timestamps are changed in the .<a href="http://pkg.st" target="_blank">pkg.st</a> file,
as this:<br>
<br>
-!Json methodsFor: 'private' stamp: 'KenD 11/23/2022
15:12:18'!<br>
+!Json methodsFor: 'private' stamp: 'KenD 23/Nov/2022
15:12:18'!</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Is this expected? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes. We abandoned the ambiguous format, as the meaning of
3/4/2022 is different at different places in the world.</p>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>In case yes, since it creates a git diff bloated with
timestamps which obscures the original change being done, it
may be best to apply the change to all .<a href="http://pkg.st" target="_blank">pkg.st</a>
packages in a single git commit named "upgrade timestamps",
what do you think?</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Done. In any case, saving the change set for any modified package
will only show your changes, so it wouldn't be a big deal either.</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>That is related to another question I had. I made a fix, added a test. Didn't know how to put both changes in the same changeset using the change sorter ui, as the methods are in different packages. Should I send one file per package (Json, Tests-Json), use the recovery log to merge all together, or join them using a text editor? </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>btw. I could track the format change to not-present in
7742, but present in 7743 (but didn't detect any change that
seems related).</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Cheers,</div>
<div>Pocho</div>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
Cheers,
<pre cols="72">--
Juan Vuletich
<a href="http://www.cuis.st" target="_blank">www.cuis.st</a>
<a href="http://github.com/jvuletich" target="_blank">github.com/jvuletich</a>
<a href="http://researchgate.net/profile/Juan-Vuletich" target="_blank">researchgate.net/profile/Juan-Vuletich</a>
<a href="http://independent.academia.edu/JuanVuletich" target="_blank">independent.academia.edu/JuanVuletich</a>
<a href="http://patents.justia.com/inventor/juan-manuel-vuletich" target="_blank">patents.justia.com/inventor/juan-manuel-vuletich</a></pre>
</div>
</blockquote></div></div>