<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><font size="4">Same. I used Gemini to work on the Gas Simulation
model physics (diffuse model and inter-atomic potential). I also
got back-up from a physician scientist but I can't work on a
computer model based on his input, it was too broad and too
complex, but it helps to double check on Gemini input, though.</font></p>
<p><font size="4">I did not even try to ask Gemini to produce
Smalltalk code. I kept this pleasure for me.</font></p>
<p><font size="4"><br>
</font></p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 05/01/2026 à 08:41, Luciano
Notarfrancesco via Cuis-dev a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAL5GDyqiCSGGDo5UqgJLMWp61skcSXKpvYZb0WFka6g42vi6iA@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="auto">I use chatgpt, claude and gemini daily, but not
for writing code. (I don’t even use refactorings much!). I think
the reason is that Smalltalk systems tend to be very simple and
small, and I often rather go over the code myself and review it
and tweak it carefully, and I enjoy doing that. Also, the time I
spend actually writing code is very small, I spend much more
time reading code and thinking about it rather than writing it.
So I’m not inclined to look for automated code writing (or
transforming) tools.</div>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mamot.fr/@drgeo">http://mamot.fr/@drgeo</a></pre>
</body>
</html>