<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><font size="4">Do you consider a Morph to be, by default, a
widget or a shape? </font></p>
<p><font size="4">Another point, it should be implemented as a morph
property, as it is done for other testing event methods.</font></p>
<p><font size="4">Consider my initial example with </font><font
size="4" style="color:rgb(0,0,0)"> PluggableListOfMorph</font><font
size="4">, the contents of the list are bordered box morph. I
don't want to subclass it to set handlesKeyboardFocus to respond
to my need, true or false.</font></p>
<p><font size="4">So an additional suggestion is </font></p>
<p><font size="4">Morph>>handlesKeyboardFocus</font></p>
<p><font size="4">^ self hasProperty: #'handlesKeyboardFocus'</font></p>
<p><font size="4">Also, please add some comments to the method. What
does it mean it handles keyboard focus? Is it to respond to TAB
keyboard or something else? It is not clear to me.</font></p>
<p><font size="4">Thanks</font></p>
<p><font size="4">Hilaire</font></p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 16/07/2026 à 07:44, Luciano
Notarfrancesco via Cuis-dev a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAL5GDyrCDhG1QWswyoHqOD2RLuq3T96=s5_OY4QBCg9kJz2fEQ@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">I was thinking, perhaps
Morph>>handlesKeyboardFocus should answer false so that
morphs don't get focus by default unless you implement this
method? Would that lead to more predictable behaviour? What's
the advantage of the current behaviour? It just saves you from
implementing handlesKeyboardFocus in your morphs or does it have
any other advantage?</div>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mamot.fr/@drgeo">http://mamot.fr/@drgeo</a></pre>
</body>
</html>