Gerald.Klix at klix.ch
Fri May 24 10:12:23 PDT 2019
I would have given Environments a shot, if I had known that they existed.
The class comments mentioned are of little use and the documentations
is rather poor and using them is rather complicated:
Conclusion: If we use namespaces we should give them an obvious name
-- "Environments" is a bad choice -- and easy to use, especially
with existing code.
Of course there should be extensions modules and applications that
really use them.
Just my 0.02€.
On 5/24/19 4:21 AM, David T. Lewis via Cuis-dev wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:15:20AM -0300, Juan Vuletich via Cuis-dev wrote:
>> I'm not commenting on Namespaces because I'm not actively working on
>> that myself.
> Good choice.
> Squeak has a very good and clean implementation of namespaces (class
> Environement et al). It is well designed, well implemented, and documented
> with good class comments.
> Nobody uses it.
> This sounds to me like exactly the kind of thing that should /not/ be
> included in Cuis.
More information about the Cuis-dev