[Cuis-dev] Problems in class Number
Phil B
pbpublist at gmail.com
Thu Oct 10 21:53:23 PDT 2019
Was that primarily due to the 64-bit version mostly fitting within
SmallInteger? I find many numeric performance issues just melt away by
staying away from Large*Integer (and Fraction)... they're great for
maintaining accuracy, lousy for performance. As in multiples to orders of
magnitude worse depending on what you're doing.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 12:40 AM Andres Valloud via Cuis-dev <
cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st> wrote:
> Fascinating --- the gcd approach was pretty bad in 32 bit land.
> However, in 64 bits, the gcd batches are large enough to amortize the
> cost, and that detects most composites without sending sqrtFloor. The
> small integer threshold is now 91 squared.
>
> On 10/10/19 20:37, Agustín Sansone via Cuis-dev wrote:
> > Well, what do you think? Are we done going over this poor method?
> >
> >
> > Okay, I'm happy with this version.
> >
> --
> Cuis-dev mailing list
> Cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st
> https://lists.cuis.st/mailman/listinfo/cuis-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cuis.st/mailman/archives/cuis-dev/attachments/20191011/f742d209/attachment.htm>
More information about the Cuis-dev
mailing list