[Cuis-dev] [ChangeSet] Fixes and enhancements to inspectors

[Andres Valloud]

Ok, now I see why though.  Update 4165 begins like this:

'From Cuis 5.0 [latest update: #4164] on 22 May 2020 at 7:53:38 pm'!
Smalltalk renameClassNamed: #OrderedCollectionInspector as: 
#SequenceableCollectionInspector!

On 5/24/20 07:45, Luciano Notarfrancesco via Cuis-dev wrote:
> I just read the code, didn’t try to fileIn yet, but that’s weird if it 
> didn’t delete it...
> 
> On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 9:41 PM, Andres Valloud via Cuis-dev 
> <cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st <mailto:cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st>> wrote:
> 
>     Now I understand even less.  After doing that, there is still a
>     SequenceableCollectionInspector, and so the fileout I sent is valid.  I
>     verified it loads as intended.
> 
>     Luciano, I can see the class deletion in 4164.  Nevertheless, after
>     doing what Juan says, the fileout I sent loads fine.  Did you run
>     into a
>     problem loading the code?  Or, was your comment more from a static
>     perspective (i.e. just looking at code and seeing something that didn't
>     make a lot of sense)?
> 
>     On 5/24/20 07:33, Andres Valloud via Cuis-dev wrote:
>      > Yeah --- next time, only one of us pushes out to the list at the
>     same
>      > time :).
>      >
>      > On 5/24/20 07:14, Juan Vuletich wrote:
>      >> Maybe to resync it would be best to start again with a git pull,
>     load
>      >> all updates, and then the changesets in this mail thread.
>      >>
>      >> On 5/24/2020 10:48 AM, Andres Valloud via Cuis-dev wrote:
>      >>> /me scratches head, what's going on here?... Juan and I have been
>      >>> exchanging code, maybe I got out of sync with him.  We did
>     agree that
>      >>> there was a method with unnecessary exception handling that
>     should be
>      >>> removed, I meant to remove that bit.
>      >>>
>      >>> On 5/24/20 06:39, Luciano Notarfrancesco via Cuis-dev wrote:
>      >>>> I don’t understand, didn’t you remove that class in 4164 above?
>      >>>>
>      >>>> On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 8:35 PM, Andres Valloud via Cuis-dev
>      >>>> <cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st <mailto:cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st>
>     <mailto:cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st <mailto:cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st>>> wrote:
>      >>>>
>      >>>>     Another small change.
>      >>>>
>      >>>>     On 5/24/20 05:32, Juan Vuletich via Cuis-dev wrote:
>      >>>> > On 5/22/2020 8:08 PM, Juan Vuletich via Cuis-dev wrote:
>      >>>> >> Hi Folks,
>      >>>> >>
>      >>>> >> Andrés Valloud and I found a couple of bugs and inconsistencies
>      >>>>     in the
>      >>>> >> Inspector hierarchy. If you don't mind crashing your image you
>      >>>>     might
>      >>>> >> try `(1 to: 2000) asFloat64Array`, or inspecting an
>      >>>>     OrderedCollection
>      >>>> >> with an object that fails in #printOn:, and cycle the
>     collection
>      >>>>     with
>      >>>> >> the arrow keys.
>      >>>> >>
>      >>>> >> We did quite some refactor and cleanup. The result is attached.
>      >>>>     Please
>      >>>> >> take a look.
>      >>>> >>
>      >>>> >> Thanks,
>      >>>> >>
>      >>>> >
>      >>>> > After those, these follow. Any comment is appreciated.
>      >>>> >
>      >>>> > Cheers,
>      >>>> >
>      >>>> >
>      >>>>     --     Cuis-dev mailing list
>      >>>> Cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st <mailto:Cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st>
>     <mailto:Cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st <mailto:Cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st>>
>      >>>> https://lists.cuis.st/mailman/listinfo/cuis-dev
>      >>>>
>      >>>>
>      >>
>      >>
>     -- 
>     Cuis-dev mailing list
>     Cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st <mailto:Cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st>
>     https://lists.cuis.st/mailman/listinfo/cuis-dev
> 
>