[Cuis-dev] Some un-accurate information on The Cuis Book

[ken.dickey at whidbey.com]

On 2023-02-26 05:31, ken.dickey--- via Cuis-dev wrote:

> BTW, we can do better.  I think -4+0i above should be and print as -4.

Ah! The code is already there and just needed to be uncommented 
(attached).

As we have Complex>>basicReal:imaginary: why does 
Complex>>real:imaginary not do the simplification?  Can we not just 
enable this?

Thanks,
-KenD
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: Complex class-realimaginary.st
URL: <http://lists.cuis.st/mailman/archives/cuis-dev/attachments/20230226/3c2a2265/attachment.ksh>