[Cuis-dev] Cuis Smalltalk Draft Wikipedia Page finally reviewed -- and REJECTED

[Juan Vuletich]

On 6/13/2024 11:37 AM, ken.dickey--- via Cuis-dev wrote:
> On 2024-06-13 02:35, Hilaire Fernandes via Cuis-dev wrote:
>
>> As frustrating as it may seems we have indirect options to trigger: 
>> attract more users.
>>
>> To do we have to improve Cuis, its documentation, build end-users 
>> projects with.
>
> Yes. I have been writing software since the '70s and have met or 
> worked with many of the developers of Scheme, Smalltalk, Common Lisp, 
> Algol, Simula, Cobol, ... I sometimes forget there are people out 
> there with no software language or development expertise.
>
> In the absence of expertise to make a judgement directly, the editors 
> are over-reliant on peer-reviewed journal publishers. I guess this is 
> prudent in a time when propaganda swamps news but is accepted as such. 
> Unfortunately, more journals these days are having to retract 
> published papers because of faked science or AI generated BS.
>
> Hard on ESUG, FAST, and other conferences which don't do peer review 
> but just invite knowledgeable people to share, however.
>
> Anyway, I did give it a try. Cuis is a small fish in the ocean. 
> Certainly more fun to play with than Wikipedia! Bodes well for growth.
>
> Good on ya,
> -KenD

Would a passing reference from no less than Dan Ingalls in "Proceedings 
of the ACM on Programming Languages, Volume 4, Issue HOPL - Article No.: 
85pp 1–101 - https://doi.org/10.1145/3386335" ("The evolution of 
Smalltalk: from Smalltalk-72 through Squeak", p.75) count as a 
peer-reviewed journal?

-- 
Juan Vuletich
cuis.st
github.com/jvuletich
researchgate.net/profile/Juan-Vuletich
independent.academia.edu/JuanVuletich
patents.justia.com/inventor/juan-manuel-vuletich
linkedin.com/in/juan-vuletich-75611b3
twitter.com/JuanVuletich