[Cuis-dev] Cuis Smalltalk Draft Wikipedia Page finally reviewed -- and REJECTED

[Andres Valloud]

Likely, if it's a direct reference to the refereed journal.  Thanks to 
the wonders of predatory publishing (grrr!), things like ResearchGate 
and even conferences do not count.  You have to link to the actual 
refereed source, and it has to have pedigree.

Also I would dig through the IWST archives, and especially through the 
special issues like this,

https://www.sciencedirect.com/special-issue/101H8DNT0DX

because I am certain there's a paper that has a direct reference to Cuis.

On 6/13/24 12:51 PM, Juan Vuletich via Cuis-dev wrote:
> Would a passing reference from no less than Dan Ingalls in "Proceedings 
> of the ACM on Programming Languages, Volume 4, Issue HOPL - Article No.: 
> 85pp 1–101 - https://doi.org/10.1145/3386335" ("The evolution of 
> Smalltalk: from Smalltalk-72 through Squeak", p.75) count as a 
> peer-reviewed journal?