[Cuis-dev] Dr Cuis

Juan Vuletich juan at cuis.st
Mon May 26 11:13:03 PDT 2025


Hi Hilaire,

On 5/25/2025 5:14 AM, Hilaire Fernandes via Cuis-dev wrote:
>
> Hi Juan,
>
> Answers in-lined.
>
> Le 19/05/2025 à 20:25, Juan Vuletich a écrit :
>> "How-to guides" also makes a lot of sense. However I would completely 
>> remove the "Virtual Machine" section. Cuis-Smalltalk-Dev already 
>> includes VMs for major platforms. 99% of Cuis users don't need to 
>> build a VM. Helping the other 1% is fine, but I think that is "Pro 
>> Level" documentation and it belongs somewhere else. Having that in 
>> the same place as building packages or working with layouts may make 
>> people think that hacking the VM is as important or frequent as doing 
>> packages and layouts. Even worse. It may lead people to believe that 
>> building their own package or using Layouts in their code is as 
>> difficult and "experts only" as hacking the VM. We provide well 
>> tested VMs for most platforms so people can forget about this as much 
>> as possible.
>
> Noted, I agree under the "first impression count" perspective. It may 
> give an unjustified feeling of difficulty.
>
>  I just removed it.
>

Thanks.

>
>>
>> "Reference guides"  is OK. I think that other reference material 
>> could be added here. Perhaps the services offered by MorphicCanvas 
>> would belong here. Or some comprehensive discussion about Unicode. 
>> I'm sure there are many more that don't come to my mind right now.
>>
>> "Explanations" looks like a place to put stuff that didn't belong in 
>> any of the previous categories. Currently it includes both 
>> introductory material, highly technical stuff, and lose bits of 
>> information. I think this could be improved. For instance, separating 
>> "Philosophical" and "Technical" material as done in 
>> Cuis-Smalltalk-Dev/Documentation, makes sense to me.
>
> The idea is to have deeper understanding, in both a technical 
> perspective (it may relate to the Technique repo) and more large scale 
> perspective (aka philosophical). The latter one may be the one not 
> fitting this category as described in the documentation system, but we 
> are free to diverge.
>
>>
>> Additionally, the question remains whether this should duplicate the 
>> material in Cuis-Smalltalk-Dev/Documentation, or which parts belong 
>> in DrCuis, and witch belong in Cuis-Smalltalk-Dev.
>
> Duplication may result in wasted resources.
>

Agreed

> Options: keeping VM, plugin, FFI to Cuis-Smalltalk-Dev, and other more 
> /classic user/ at DrCuis
>

Yes. This is a good idea.

As a start, I just removed Documentation/Technical/Morphic as it was 
moved to DrCuis. Same for Documentation/Technical/MiscProgramming and 
Documentation/Technical/Compiler.

> -- 
> http://mamot.fr/@drgeo

Thanks,

-- 
Juan Vuletich
cuis.st
github.com/jvuletich
researchgate.net/profile/Juan-Vuletich
independent.academia.edu/JuanVuletich
patents.justia.com/inventor/juan-manuel-vuletich
linkedin.com/in/juan-vuletich-75611b3
twitter.com/JuanVuletich

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cuis.st/mailman/archives/cuis-dev/attachments/20250526/7b3f09a0/attachment.htm>


More information about the Cuis-dev mailing list