[Cuis-dev] Some useful assertions for SUnit

Juan Vuletich juan at jvuletich.org
Mon May 13 04:37:10 PDT 2019

On 5/13/2019 8:24 AM, Hernan Wilkinson via Cuis-dev wrote:
> I like them! I think we should add them to TestCase directly... Juan, 
> what do you think?
> Why did you called them "semantic" assertions?
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 12:46 AM Gastón Caruso via Cuis-dev 
> <cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st <mailto:cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st>> wrote:
>     Hi all, I wrote some assertions for SUnit that I think would be
>     useful to include in cuis.
>     My goal is to get better error messages when a test fails.
>     Let me know what you think.
>     This is the repository where I'm working on
>     https://github.com/gstn-caruso/SemanticAssertions
>     Thanks!
>     Gastón
>     -- 
>     Cuis-dev mailing list
>     Cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st <mailto:Cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st>
>     https://lists.cuis.st/mailman/listinfo/cuis-dev
> -- 
> *Hernán Wilkinson
> Agile Software Development, Teaching & Coaching*
> *Phone: +54-011*-4893-2057
> *Twitter: @HernanWilkinson*
> *site: http://www.10Pines.com <http://www.10pines.com/>*
> Address: Alem 896, Floor 6, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Useful and nice contribution!

Still, I agree with Hernán. Gastón, as we talked on Saturday, the 
methods added to TestCase should go in the base image, and the test 
should go in the BaseImageTests package.

Additionally, as Hernán suggests, maybe 'semantic' is not the best word 
to describe this.


Juan Vuletich

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cuis.st/mailman/archives/cuis-dev/attachments/20190513/d349904f/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Cuis-dev mailing list