[Cuis-dev] Some useful assertions for SUnit

[Gastón Caruso]

I miss to remove the category! I'll rename it later.

On Mon, May 13, 2019, 08:37 Juan Vuletich via Cuis-dev <
cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st> wrote:

> On 5/13/2019 8:24 AM, Hernan Wilkinson via Cuis-dev wrote:
>
> I like them! I think we should add them to TestCase directly... Juan, what
> do you think?
> Why did you called them "semantic" assertions?
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 12:46 AM Gastón Caruso via Cuis-dev <
> cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st> wrote:
>
>> Hi all, I wrote some assertions for SUnit that I think would be useful to
>> include in cuis.
>> My goal is to get better error messages when a test fails.
>>
>> Let me know what you think.
>> This is the repository where I'm working on
>> https://github.com/gstn-caruso/SemanticAssertions
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Gastón
>> --
>> Cuis-dev mailing list
>> Cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st
>> https://lists.cuis.st/mailman/listinfo/cuis-dev
>>
>
>
> --
>
> *Hernán Wilkinson Agile Software Development, Teaching & Coaching*
> *Phone: +54-011*-4893-2057
> *Twitter: @HernanWilkinson*
> *site: http://www.10Pines.com <http://www.10pines.com/>*
> Address: Alem 896, Floor 6, Buenos Aires, Argentina
>
>
> Useful and nice contribution!
>
> Still, I agree with Hernán. Gastón, as we talked on Saturday, the methods
> added to TestCase should go in the base image, and the test should go in
> the BaseImageTests package.
>
> Additionally, as Hernán suggests, maybe 'semantic' is not the best word to
> describe this.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Juan Vuletichwww.cuis-smalltalk.orghttps://github.com/Cuis-Smalltalk/Cuis-Smalltalk-Devhttps://github.com/jvuletichhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/juan-vuletich-75611b3
> @JuanVuletich
>
> --
> Cuis-dev mailing list
> Cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st
> https://lists.cuis.st/mailman/listinfo/cuis-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cuis.st/mailman/archives/cuis-dev/attachments/20190513/827a4c81/attachment.html>