[Cuis-dev] [ChangeSet] Fixes and enhancements to inspectors

[Andres Valloud]

Yeah --- next time, only one of us pushes out to the list at the same 
time :).

On 5/24/20 07:14, Juan Vuletich wrote:
> Maybe to resync it would be best to start again with a git pull, load 
> all updates, and then the changesets in this mail thread.
> 
> On 5/24/2020 10:48 AM, Andres Valloud via Cuis-dev wrote:
>> /me scratches head, what's going on here?... Juan and I have been 
>> exchanging code, maybe I got out of sync with him.  We did agree that 
>> there was a method with unnecessary exception handling that should be 
>> removed, I meant to remove that bit.
>>
>> On 5/24/20 06:39, Luciano Notarfrancesco via Cuis-dev wrote:
>>> I don’t understand, didn’t you remove that class in 4164 above?
>>>
>>> On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 8:35 PM, Andres Valloud via Cuis-dev 
>>> <cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st <mailto:cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Another small change.
>>>
>>>     On 5/24/20 05:32, Juan Vuletich via Cuis-dev wrote:
>>> > On 5/22/2020 8:08 PM, Juan Vuletich via Cuis-dev wrote:
>>> >> Hi Folks,
>>> >>
>>> >> Andrés Valloud and I found a couple of bugs and inconsistencies
>>>     in the
>>> >> Inspector hierarchy. If you don't mind crashing your image you
>>>     might
>>> >> try `(1 to: 2000) asFloat64Array`, or inspecting an
>>>     OrderedCollection
>>> >> with an object that fails in #printOn:, and cycle the collection
>>>     with
>>> >> the arrow keys.
>>> >>
>>> >> We did quite some refactor and cleanup. The result is attached.
>>>     Please
>>> >> take a look.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > After those, these follow. Any comment is appreciated.
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> >
>>> >
>>>     --     Cuis-dev mailing list
>>>     Cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st <mailto:Cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st>
>>>     https://lists.cuis.st/mailman/listinfo/cuis-dev
>>>
>>>
> 
>