[Cuis-dev] [ChangeSet] Fixes and enhancements to inspectors

[Andres Valloud]

Now I understand even less.  After doing that, there is still a 
SequenceableCollectionInspector, and so the fileout I sent is valid.  I 
verified it loads as intended.

Luciano, I can see the class deletion in 4164.  Nevertheless, after 
doing what Juan says, the fileout I sent loads fine.  Did you run into a 
problem loading the code?  Or, was your comment more from a static 
perspective (i.e. just looking at code and seeing something that didn't 
make a lot of sense)?

On 5/24/20 07:33, Andres Valloud via Cuis-dev wrote:
> Yeah --- next time, only one of us pushes out to the list at the same 
> time :).
> 
> On 5/24/20 07:14, Juan Vuletich wrote:
>> Maybe to resync it would be best to start again with a git pull, load 
>> all updates, and then the changesets in this mail thread.
>>
>> On 5/24/2020 10:48 AM, Andres Valloud via Cuis-dev wrote:
>>> /me scratches head, what's going on here?... Juan and I have been 
>>> exchanging code, maybe I got out of sync with him.  We did agree that 
>>> there was a method with unnecessary exception handling that should be 
>>> removed, I meant to remove that bit.
>>>
>>> On 5/24/20 06:39, Luciano Notarfrancesco via Cuis-dev wrote:
>>>> I don’t understand, didn’t you remove that class in 4164 above?
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 8:35 PM, Andres Valloud via Cuis-dev 
>>>> <cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st <mailto:cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Another small change.
>>>>
>>>>     On 5/24/20 05:32, Juan Vuletich via Cuis-dev wrote:
>>>> > On 5/22/2020 8:08 PM, Juan Vuletich via Cuis-dev wrote:
>>>> >> Hi Folks,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Andrés Valloud and I found a couple of bugs and inconsistencies
>>>>     in the
>>>> >> Inspector hierarchy. If you don't mind crashing your image you
>>>>     might
>>>> >> try `(1 to: 2000) asFloat64Array`, or inspecting an
>>>>     OrderedCollection
>>>> >> with an object that fails in #printOn:, and cycle the collection
>>>>     with
>>>> >> the arrow keys.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> We did quite some refactor and cleanup. The result is attached.
>>>>     Please
>>>> >> take a look.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Thanks,
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> > After those, these follow. Any comment is appreciated.
>>>> >
>>>> > Cheers,
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>     --     Cuis-dev mailing list
>>>>     Cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st <mailto:Cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st>
>>>>     https://lists.cuis.st/mailman/listinfo/cuis-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>