[Cuis-dev] Renaming several fundamental Morph classes

[Luciano Notarfrancesco]

Also I think we should call all morphs *Morph, at least in the base image.
And I don’t think we should make the hand and the world “special” by giving
them a special superclass. I think trying to separate “system” morphs from
“user” morphs is not a good idea, all morphs should be regarded on the same
conceptual level, all are morphs and there’s nothing special about them
except implementation details.

On Fri, 24 Dec 2021 at 1:12 PM Luciano Notarfrancesco <luchiano at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I’ve been thinking about it and I would rename KernelMorph to
> RectangularMorph, as in the original Morphic, because I think having
> rectangular bounds is enough to call it “rectangular”. It’s not a
> rectangle, tho (it wouldn’t make sense to call it RectangleMorph). And
> about WidgetMorph I’d keep that name and make it subclass of
> RectangularMorph (it just adds borderWidth and borderColor).
>
> On Fri, 24 Dec 2021 at 4:38 AM Nicola Mingotti via Cuis-dev <
> cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 12/23/21 20:55, ken.dickey at whidbey.com wrote:
>> > On 2021-12-23 10:30, Nicola Mingotti via Cuis-dev wrote:
>> >> On 12/21/21 20:02, Juan Vuletich via Cuis-dev wrote:
>> > ..
>> >>> PasteUpMorph   -> PlaygroundMorph
>> >
>> >> . I have a strong dislike for "playgroundXXX" . I don't like it in
>> >> Pharo Workspace, i don't like it in Apple products.
>> >
>> > Actually, I think PasteUpMorph is a better name to keep.
>> >
>> > $0.02,
>> > -KenD
>>
>> +1
>>
>> --
>> Cuis-dev mailing list
>> Cuis-dev at lists.cuis.st
>> https://lists.cuis.st/mailman/listinfo/cuis-dev
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cuis.st/mailman/archives/cuis-dev/attachments/20211224/676bbc65/attachment.htm>