[Cuis-dev] Doubt about timestamps

Javier Pimás elpochodelagente at gmail.com
Tue Dec 23 12:34:32 PST 2025


On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 4:46 PM Juan Vuletich <juan at cuis.st> wrote:

> Hi Pocho,
> On 2025-12-23 3:08 PM, Javier Pimás via Cuis-dev wrote:
>
> Hi cuisers,
>
> I did a change to Json package and when saving it to disk I noticed that
> all preexisting timestamps are changed in the .pkg.st file, as this:
>
> -!Json methodsFor: 'private' stamp: 'KenD 11/23/2022 15:12:18'!
> +!Json methodsFor: 'private' stamp: 'KenD 23/Nov/2022 15:12:18'!
>
> Is this expected?
>
> Yes. We abandoned the ambiguous format, as the meaning of 3/4/2022 is
> different at different places in the world.
>
> In case yes, since it creates a git diff bloated with timestamps which
> obscures the original change being done, it may be best to apply the change
> to all .pkg.st packages in a single git commit named "upgrade
> timestamps", what do you think?
>
> Done. In any case, saving the change set for any modified package will
> only show your changes, so it wouldn't be a big deal either.
>

That is related to another question I had. I made a fix, added a test.
Didn't know how to put both changes in the same changeset using the change
sorter ui, as the methods are in different packages. Should I send one file
per package (Json, Tests-Json), use the recovery log to merge all together,
or join them using a text editor?

>
> btw. I could track the format change to not-present in 7742, but present
> in 7743 (but didn't detect any change that seems related).
>
> Cheers,
> Pocho
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Juan Vuletichwww.cuis.stgithub.com/jvuletichresearchgate.net/profile/Juan-Vuletichindependent.academia.edu/JuanVuletichpatents.justia.com/inventor/juan-manuel-vuletich
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cuis.st/mailman/archives/cuis-dev/attachments/20251223/6ee4718a/attachment.htm>


More information about the Cuis-dev mailing list