[Cuis-dev] [Integrated] Should we rename these? Re: support for variable indexable subclasses of 8/16/32/64 bits
ken.dickey at whidbey.com
ken.dickey at whidbey.com
Sun May 26 16:06:29 PDT 2019
On 2019-05-26 13:49, Juan Vuletich via Cuis-dev wrote:
..
> Folks, these names are getting confusing. I think we'd name them
> better. What about ByteArray, SignedByteArray, Int16Array,
> SignedInt16Array, Int32Array, SignedInt32Array, Int64Array,
> SignedInt64Array, Float32Array, Double64Array, SignedPoint16Array and
> SignedPoint32Array?
I prefer Float64Array to Double64Array (I see reference in 64-bit CPU
architecture docs to byte/half/word/double/quad integers as well as
floats).
$0.02,
-KenD
More information about the Cuis-dev
mailing list